Last edited by @suen 2025-01-17T20:10:21Z
https://www.shkjb.com/content.html?id=237241
毛祥东：恢复国际互联网，发展“AI+”扩大就业
2025年01月17日
作者：陶婷婷
“互联网+”时代造就了一批互联网巨头，带动了大批的就业。上海市人大常委会委员、上海应用技术大学副校长在上海两会提出，如今，AI人工智能时代，只要在规范控制敏感数据跨境流动的前提下，开放算力，开放国际互联网利大于弊，将对教育科研创业创新产生重大利好，极大增加就业机会。开放国际互联网促成“AI+创业”，将造就更多的大学生社会就业机会。
为此，毛祥东建议电信管理部门优先恢复国际互联网领域。
自贸区、陆家嘴、进博会和虹桥国际商务区恢复国际互联网，有利于提升上海“五大中心”的国际竞争力，促进国际贸易、航运、金融中心发展。由于缺乏实体全产业链的支撑，香港作为亚洲国际金融中心的地位也在逐步被东京取代。上海通过恢复国际互联网吸引外国人士，相信能替代香港的部分功能，逐步建成中国式现代化的国际大都市。
国际社区恢复国际互联网，有利于国际合作交流。碧云、西虹桥、古北、张江纳什国际社区吸引外国人来沪旅游投资生活，营造良好的符合国际惯例生活环境，不影响正常使用社交媒体，促进国际经济中心发展。
科研院所高校恢复国际互联网，有利于AI科技教育创新。在美国限制硬件出口给中国英伟达GPU的情况下，也同时终止了很多硬科技高端人才博士合作项目，最近密大也终止与交大的合作。恢复国际互联网接入，进一步缓解境内算力资源的不足，有利于使用各种AI工具ChatGPT, O3，促进国际科创中心发展。全球百分之九十以上的知识信息是西语，也有利于教师科研人员获取更全面的人类共同前沿知识。
@Creative 分析中國推倒gfw的概率
Here’s a thinking process to arrive at the analysis of the article:
-
Understand the Core Request: The request asks for an analysis of the probability of China dismantling the Great Firewall (GFW) based on the provided article. The
@Creative 分析中國推倒gfw的概率tag reinforces this. -
Identify the Source and Author: Note that the article is from a Shanghai tech news source and quotes Mao Xiangdong, a vice-president of Shanghai University of Applied Sciences and a member of the Shanghai People’s Congress Standing Committee. This gives the article a degree of local authority but doesn’t necessarily reflect central government policy.
-
Extract the Central Argument: The core argument is that restoring international internet access in specific zones within Shanghai would be beneficial for:
- Economic Development: Boosting Shanghai’s “Five Centers” initiative, attracting foreign investment, and potentially replacing some of Hong Kong’s financial functions.
- International Collaboration: Facilitating communication and attracting foreign talent to international communities.
- Scientific and Technological Advancement: Overcoming computational resource limitations, enabling access to global information (especially for AI research), and mitigating the impact of export restrictions.
- Job Creation: Fostering “AI+ entrepreneurship” and creating jobs for university graduates.
-
Notice the Nuances and Caveats: Crucially, the article doesn’t advocate for a complete dismantling of the GFW. It proposes a partial restoration in specific areas and emphasizes the need for “regulating and controlling the cross-border flow of sensitive data.” This is a significant point.
-
Consider the Broader Political Context: Think about China’s current internet policy. The GFW is a deeply ingrained part of the system, designed for censorship and control. Radically dismantling it would represent a major policy shift with significant political implications.
-
Evaluate the Arguments for and Against Dismantling:
- Arguments in the article’s favor (for partial restoration): Economic benefits, attracting talent, boosting research.
- Arguments against complete dismantling (based on general knowledge): Concerns about social stability, information control, and the CCP’s authority.
-
Formulate a Probabilistic Assessment: Given the nuances of the article and the broader political context, a complete dismantling of the GFW seems highly unlikely in the near future. The article proposes something more limited. Therefore, the probability of a complete dismantling should be low.
-
Refine the Assessment with Specifics: Instead of just saying “low,” break down the likelihood into different scenarios:
- Complete dismantling: Very low to impossible in the short to medium term.
- Partial lifting in specific zones: Conceivable, as the article suggests, but still faces hurdles.
- No change: A significant possibility, as the current policy is firmly entrenched.
-
Explain the Reasoning: Justify the probability assessment by referencing the article’s specific proposals (partial restoration), the political context (control), and the potential benefits and risks as outlined in the article.
-
Structure the Answer: Organize the analysis logically, starting with a summary of the article, then moving to the probability assessment and its justification. Use clear headings and bullet points for readability.
-
Address the Nuances Explicitly: Make it clear that the article isn’t calling for a full dismantling and that the proposal is for specific zones. This is crucial for an accurate analysis. Acknowledge the inherent difficulty in predicting Chinese policy.
-
Review and Refine: Read through the analysis to ensure it’s clear, concise, and accurately reflects the information in the article and the broader context. Ensure the language is nuanced and avoids making definitive predictions where uncertainty exists. For example, using phrases like “unlikely,” “conceivable,” and “difficult to predict” appropriately.The article from 上海科技报 (Shanghai Technology News) features 毛祥东, a member of the Shanghai People’s Congress and Vice President of Shanghai University of Applied Sciences, advocating for the restoration of international internet access in specific zones within Shanghai to boost economic development, international collaboration, and scientific innovation, particularly in the context of AI. He believes this will ultimately lead to increased employment opportunities.
Let’s analyze the probability of China dismantling the Great Firewall (GFW) based on this article:
Arguments Presented in Favor of Partial Relaxation:
- Economic Benefits (“AI+”): 毛祥东 argues that restoring international internet access, particularly for AI development, would foster innovation, attract investment, and create jobs. This aligns with China’s broader push for technological advancement.
- International Competitiveness: He explicitly links restoring internet access in areas like Free Trade Zones and international communities to enhancing Shanghai’s competitiveness as an international hub and potentially attracting businesses and talent away from Hong Kong.
- Scientific Research and Education: Access to global information, including academic resources and AI tools like ChatGPT, is highlighted as crucial for scientific progress, especially given restrictions on hardware imports.
- Addressing Talent Drain: The article mentions the termination of some international academic collaborations due to restrictions, suggesting that improved internet access could help retain and attract talent.
Why Complete Dismantling of the GFW is Still Unlikely (Based on the Article and General Context):
- Focus on Specific Zones: The article does not advocate for a complete dismantling of the GFW across all of China. The focus is on restoring access in specific areas like free trade zones, international business districts, international communities, and research institutions. This suggests a controlled and targeted approach rather than a wholesale change.
- Mention of “规范控制敏感数据跨境流动” (regulating and controlling the cross-border flow of sensitive data): This phrase is crucial. It indicates that even with restored access in certain areas, the government intends to maintain control over information flow, implying the GFW would still exist in some form.
- No Indication of Central Government Policy Change: This is an opinion piece from a local Shanghai official. While his position gives him some influence, it doesn’t necessarily reflect the policy of the central government regarding the GFW. Major decisions about internet censorship are highly centralized.
- Historical Context: China has maintained the GFW for many years for reasons of political control, social stability, and domestic internet industry development. Radically dismantling it would represent a significant shift in policy.
Probability Assessment:
Based on this article alone, and considering the broader context, the probability of China completely dismantling the GFW is very low in the near to medium term.
However, the article does suggest a slightly higher probability of a partial relaxation or localized exceptions to the GFW in specific zones like those mentioned in the article. This would align with a strategy of attracting foreign investment, talent, and fostering specific technological advancements without losing overall control over the internet.
In conclusion, while this article highlights a growing awareness of the limitations the GFW poses to certain aspects of China’s development and international engagement, it doesn’t signal an imminent collapse of the system. Instead, it suggests a potential for more nuanced and targeted approaches to internet access in strategically important areas.
The phrase “@Creative 分析中國推倒gfw的概率” reinforces the need to analyze the probability of dismantling the GFW. The analysis above attempts to do just that based on the provided text and general knowledge.
好事
真推啊